Do You Believe These Brand Myths?

Written by Chipo Mapungwana

When their brands fail companies are always taken by surprise. Marketers wonder why the product did not sell. Customers wonder why the company concerned would try and sell such a product and investors wonder how to recoup the losses.

This is because Companies  have had faith in their brands from the start, otherwise it would never have been launched in the first place. However, this brand faith often stems from an obscured attitude towards branding, based around one or a combination of the following brand myths:

A good name and a creative logo makes a brand

While creative logos and great sounding names are part of the branding process, they do not make a brand. Brands are created when customers identify with the product and make the product or service part of the family so to speak. The marketing department can do what it can to put the product out there for people to experience, but it is customers who decide on the value your product is adding to their lives and whether your product is an iphone or a myphone, a Facebook or a Myspace.

If a product is good, it will succeed.

This is blatantly untrue. In fact, good products are as likely to fail as bad products. Betamax, for instance, had better picture and audio quality than VHS video recorders. But it failed disastrously.

Brands are more likely to succeed than fail.

Wrong. Brands fail every single day. According to some estimates, 80 per cent of all new products fail upon introduction, and a further 10 per cent die within five years. By launching a product you are taking a one in ten chance of long-term success. As Robert McMath, a former Procter & Gamble marketing executive, once put it: ‘it’s easier for a product to fail than it is to survive.’

Big companies will always have brand success.

This myth can be dismantled with two words: New Coke. Big companies have managed to have at least as much failure as success. No company is big enough to be immune to brand disaster. In fact one of the main paradoxes of branding – is that as brands get bigger and more successful, they also become more vulnerable and exposed.

Strong brands are built on advertising.

Advertising can support brands, but it can’t build them from scratch. Many of the world’s biggest brand failures accompanied extremely expensive advertising campaigns. Ultimately, customers build brands through their patronage and continued loyalty.

If it’s something new, it’s going to sell.

There may be a gap in the market, but it doesn’t mean it has to be filled. This lesson was learnt the hard way for RJR Nabisco Holdings when they decided to launch a ‘smokeless’ cigarette. ‘It took them a while to figure out that smokers actually like the smoke part of smoking,’ one commentator said at the time.

Strong brands protect products.

This may have once been the case, but now the situation is reversed. Strong products now help to protect brands. The product has become the ambassador of the brand and even the slightest decrease in quality or a hint of trouble will affect the brand identity as a whole. The consumer can cause the most elaborate brand strategy to end in failure.

Courtesy of Matt Haig. Brand Failures


About chipomaps

A brand reputation, marketing and new media trainer and consultant. Constantly curious, constantly learning.
This entry was posted in Branding, Marketing and tagged , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s